Member
Today I typed Ron Paul into my Google search engine, and the Google News section didn't pop up. I had to click the "News" tab just to see what was up. I went back to a normal search, looked through the whole first page, then the second page, then the third page... Google doesn't post "News results for Ron Paul" when you search his name... I'd been noticing that they would post pictures OTHER than Dr. Paul, whenever the Ron Paul news would come up, or that the link would be put lower and lower on the page. What's up, Google? I googled 'Mitt Romney' and News results for mitt romney was the FIRST link that popped up.
And now, it takes me a while to load up Ron Paul forums, is there construction going up on this page or is my high-speed internet just slower at picking up this website? I'm not tech-savvy or anything, so I don't really know if my concerns are legitimate, but they're concerns nonetheless.
One things for sure, if they think they can shut out/censor/blackout Dr. Paul's message, then they can sure as hell expect me to join Dr. Paul in his march on Washington!!!
Damn those Googlers, now they're causing PICTURES OTHER THAN RON PAUL to load.
Senior Member
Time-Warner owns google. That should answer your question.
Well it certainly answers some questions. But don't worry Haliburton and the Freemasons own everyone.
Member google is a CFR memeber though
wikipedia shows google as a CFR member though
No wonder Google keeps trying to get me to join the New World Order.
Member
RucdelaSpook, who do you think setup Google and why?
An Old Analyst needs a younger analyst to avoid tin foil hat transference.
Member Don't look at me...
I have no idea. I guess I could look it up on Wikipedia. I saw a documentary on Google once, and it looked like a bunch of college kids made it. I do think that Google has a lot of power though. In the interview with some blond woman (i think she was vice-president or something), they asked her why Google just retains everything and why they never delete their user information. She kind of gave a bad reason why they were doing this (something about how it went into the efficiency of their search engine and the algorithms, and that it was faster to keep a memory of what the user was trying to look for), but I was a little concerned. That's one of the reasons why I don't use Gmail-- if that makes any difference. Also, because some Chinese guy got sent to prison (and killed?)because they bowed to the Chinese Gov't.
And Rucdela keeps demonstrating her insightful knowledge of the internets.
You can say a lot of things about America but the fact that these morons didn't get their way in the primaries almost gives me hope.
Senior Member
I will be darned They are a member according to that. My membership list does not show that, but shows Reader's Digest, which is not on that list. It would be almost impossible to boycott all those companies..what have we let our nation become?